Josna Rege

174. Con Men, Card Sharks, and Playing a Different Game

In 1970s, Immigration, Music, Stories, United States on February 11, 2013 at 12:32 am
(from popmodal.com)

(from popmodal.com)

The other day I was teaching my students about cultural codes, how they make sense to insiders but can be unintelligible to someone who is unable to interpret them. As an example, I cited the movie they showed us on the flight to the United States when we first immigrated in 1970: all I can recall of it was two men (cowboys? The Western was the only recognizable genre in which I could place it) hiding out in some building, a couple of love scenes, a lot of shooting, and a big musical number. I soon recognized the song on the radio—Raindrops Keep Fallin’ on My Head was at the top of the charts when we arrived—and some time later, identified the two men as Robert Redford and Paul Newman (although they possessed an American brand of boyish good looks that I couldn’t appreciate). The film turned out to be the highly acclaimed Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid, which received seven Oscar nominations and four Academy Awards and earned a place in the Library of Congress’ National Film Registry as “culturally, historically, or aesthetically significant.” But I couldn’t understand why it was such a big deal. I didn’t know then that it drew on the popular U.S. figure of Outlaw-as-Good-Guy. Unlike Robin Hood, he doesn’t steal from the rich to give to the poor; he steals from the rich for the hell of it and women fall for him right and left.

A few years later, another blockbuster featuring the same duo swept the Academy Awards—The Sting (1973). By now I could appreciate its lead actors as handsome (in an American sort of way, though they weren’t my type) and classify it as a movie about con men—again, beloved figures in American popular culture. I still didn’t really understand or enjoy the film, and to this day I don’t think I’ve watched it all the way through, remembering only Scott Joplin’s ragtime piano and a lot of cheating at cards. But at least I was beginning to recognize the cultural codes embedded in it.

(from playwinningpoker.com)

(from playwinningpoker.com)

Why is the card-shark such a quintessentially American figure? Because he gets rich by stacking the deck and beating the odds. Why is he such a beloved figure, whom people root for despite his being on the wrong side of the law? Is it precisely because Americans know that they are not striving for success on a level playing field? Perhaps, since the deck is stacked against the little guy, only a trickster can come out on top. But in fact, many of these tricksters have been big-time con men, not little guys at all.

Richard A. Canfield (meltonpriorinstitut.org)

Richard A. Canfield (meltonpriorinstitut.org)

One of my favorite card games, taught to me by my father-in-law, was developed by one such big-time con man, Richard A. Canfield (1855-1914), who ran a lucrative illegal gambling operation throughout the northeastern United States and was responsible for developing the resort casino. Canfield gave his name to a version of Solitaire (a card game I knew as Patience, growing up) with such a low probability of winning that in England it is simply known as Demon. Apparently Canfield sold gamblers a pack of cards for $50, which they could then win back at $5 per card for every card they could place in the “foundations”—that is, for every card they could stack in four piles starting with the ace of each suit. It looked easy, but the odds of winning are 1-30, and many a hopeful must have lost his shirt. All I lose is time—lots of it. I play and replay it addictively at home, and keep telling myself, “just one more game,” just until I beat Canfield.

Malcolm Gladwell argues in his book Outliers that the secret of success in any endeavor is to work at it for 10,000 hours. If the 10,000-hour rule applied to playing Canfield I should have my own casino empire by now. But when the odds are against you, you can’t win unless you either out-shark the shark or play a different game. Which, by the way, is what both Paul Newman and Robert Redford did with Newman’s Own Foundation and the Sundance Institute, each brilliant examples of taking on the big guys and playing a different—and better—game.

“Robert Redford and Paul Newman”, from Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid, photograph at Photo LA (from dorothygoldeen.com)

“Robert Redford and Paul Newman”, from Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid, photograph at Photo LA (from dorothygoldeen.com)

(And okay, I admit it: those guys are good-looking.)

Tell Me Another (Contents to Date)

Chronological Table of Contents

Advertisements
  1. I often play Solitaire with the $50/deck premise…if only so I don’t loose too much time (and imaginary money) to the game 🙂 Would love for you to let me in on “Demon” (I think!)

  2. Hello sometiger and thanks for commenting! It sounds as if you are more disciplined than I am when you play. Perhaps I ought to start imagining that I am losing actual money and quit when I have lost some predetermined amount. According to my internet searches, “Demon” is just the British name for Canfield’s version of Solitaire (the one we both play). There is another card game that I love, called Running Demons, which I learned from an old friend of mine, but it is quite different. It can’t be played alone, and each player contributes a pack. It is super-competitive—as fast-paced and frenetic as Solitaire is slow and calm. Best wishes, J

  3. Those guys are good looking. : ) Interesting to hear your take on “Butch Cassidy.” I’ve always liked the movie, but never the music. As for “The Sting”: The ending was actually quite good & shifted the perspective on the rest of the movie, in a way. I wonder what other cultures’ versions are of card sharks. Any ideas?

    Interesting to learn of Canfield, but I will never, ever ask you to teach me to play Demon. If we get casinos out here, I guess we’ll start seeing the updated versions, eh?

    • Someday I should take another look at Butch Cassidy. I suspect it’ll seem like a completely different movie than the one I saw en route to the States all those years ago. Same with The Sting.I have no idea about how other cultures represent card sharks; perhaps I was unfairly ascribing to the U.S. alone attitudes that are shared by many societies. I won’t teach you Canfield (aka Demon), but someday I’d love to teach you the Indian game Running Demons. As for casinos–ugh! Did you hear the news about online gambling being approved in New Jersey? The NPR story went through a long litany of concerns, but quickly came to the bottom line–we have to approve it because there’s too much revenue involved.

  4. […] 174. Con Men, Card Sharks, and Playing a Different Game […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: